Monday, April 11, 2016

Pregnancy, Drug Use, and Why Prison Is Not The Solution – Huffington Post

In Brand-new Hampshire, a bill to redefine opioid usage or addiction in pregnant women as kid abuse is making its method through the legislature, despite vocal objection from the state’s medical community. Considerably media treatment of this bill and similar bills in others states presumes women are not generally held criminally responsible for terminating–or losing–a pregnancy.

This illusion is increasingly hard to sustain.

In March 2015, Purvi Patel, a 33-year-old woman in Indiana, was sentenced to twenty years imprisonment for, prosecutors claim, inducing an abortion. Patel has actually maintained she had a miscarriage, and has actually never ever tested positive for any type of of the abortifacients the prosecution claims she took. In fact, the pathologist for the prosecution partially relied on the long discredited “lung test” to find out if the recovered fetus had been born alive: a method from the 17th century disproven as unsatisfactory science over a century ago. Whether a miscarriage or an induced abortion, it is clear that Patel is in jail for not carrying a pregnancy to term.

Indeed, state legislators increasingly seek to hold women criminally responsible for not having healthy and balanced pregnancy outcomes. Because the start of this year, a minimum of eight state legislatures have actually introduced bills to redefine legal personhood as starting at “fertilization” or “conception.” Though voters have actually generally rejected personhood measures as quickly as place to a vote–three times in Colorado alone–they preserve resurfacing in Brand-new versions.

From a medical perspective, fetal personhood bills make no sense. “Conception” is not a medical term and is interchangeably used to refer to the moment an ovum is fertilized and the moment a fertilized ovum implants in the uterine lining. “Fertilization” is a medical term–referring to fusion of male and female gametes to form a zygote–yet not all of fertilized ova implant in the uterine lining (that is: not all of result in a pregnancy), and the precise moment of the 2 fertilization and implantation is hard to determine. As a result, the length of a pregnancy is usually calculated along with reference to the pregnant woman’s last period–as quickly as she clearly was not pregnant yet–since that moment is an observable factor that can easily be defined.

There are likewise obvious logistical complications along with fetal personhood bills. An estimated 10 to twenty percent of known pregnancies end in miscarriages, along with the actual number most likely Considerably greater as numerous women miscarry prior to they already know they are pregnant. In addition, the risk of miscarriage is greater for personal teams of women, such as older women, women along with weight problems, women that have actually already miscarried, those that have actually contracted infections or that have actually immune response issues, and those that constantly usage drugs, including alcohol and nicotine.

As a result, the implementation of fetal personhood laws would certainly require unconstitutional discrimination and invasion of privacy. If a fertilized ovum has actually the very same rights as a individual after birth, each miscarriage (or failure to implant) would certainly should be scrutinized for intentional or reckless neglect. Detection would certainly just be feasible by registering all of incidents of unprotected sex, and efficient surveillance would certainly require normal pregnancy testing, in particular of women at risk of miscarriage (believe mandatory weekly pregnancy testing for women over 40 until they reach menopause). Of course, no one is advocating this.

Proponents of punitive pregnancy-related provisions have, however, successfully advocated for the growing surveillance of pregnant women from marginalized or stigmatized communities through social services, and in particular through medical providers. The organization National Advocates for Pregnant Women has actually documented the growing arsenal of state laws that handle drug usage and addiction in pregnant women as a form of kid abuse. since healthiness care providers in all states should report kid abuse to the authorities, this reframing forces doctors and nurses to breach patient confidentiality for pregnant women that admit to struggling along with drug usage or addiction. The predictable result is a breakdown in the therapeutic partnership at best, and at worst, a reluctance to seek care at all of for the women that arguably reason it the most.

Many of these bills are pushed through devoid of consulting the medical community, which is the case for the bill currently pending in Brand-new Hampshire. Home hearings are under way, and the 2 pediatricians and obstetric-gynecologists will certainly testify to its predictably disastrous effects on the provision of addiction treatment and kid welfare.

To be sure, the 2 kid abuse and drug addiction are significant matters, which require right state support. Attempts to redefine drug usage or addiction as kid abuse in pregnant women, however, disregard the medical and psychological requires of the 2 abused youngsters and pregnant women. Advocates of such legislation are attempting to transform the fiction of fetal personhood in to law by appropriating the problem of kid abuse and punishing pregnant women in reason of treatment for substance dependency or addiction.

A fetus is not a kid and a women’s right to go for an elective abortion ought to not be circumvented by legislating punishment for women in reason of treatment for substance usage disorders. Legislators ought to listen to the medical community. Whether the conversation is concerning elective abortion, treatment for substance usage disorder, or any type of others medical intervention, decisions concerning care are ideal earned by the patient in private consultation along with her doctor.